I’m currently reading The Art of Logic by Eugenia Cheng (and thoroughly enjoying by the way). In a chapter titled ‘How to be Right’ she deals with the topic of sweeping statements. She points to the fact that, while statements like ‘you never do the washing up‘, are not meant literally most of the time, …
While public board and committee meetings have the potential to be both constructive and productive, often this is not the case. Sometimes independent board and committee members feel that nothing ever really changes as a result of meetings. At other times friction and bad tempers create more heat than light. Knowing that a meeting is …
This is a follow up to my previous post From Q&As to constructive conversations. If we want governance conversations to be more constructive then they need to be more professional. It’s helpful in this context to look at what the professional conversation experts, in other words the facilitators, coaches, mediators, therapists, supervisors and counsellors, are …
In this meet up we worked on the tricky issue of the organisational culture that supports scrutiny (or not). First we used a Venn diagram to find out how the ‘three pillars of scrutiny” (Culture, Process, Structure) were working for everyone. As you can see above, the most common position is to have process and structure …
Now that local councils are getting the hang of virtual meetings, it’s time think more about viewer experience to take advantage of the increased numbers tuning in. As councils are already demonstrating, there has never been a better time to experiment. During lockdown local councils have been conducting their meetings virtually and, while this has been …
We are looking for sponsors in addition to our main supporter, the Centre for Public Scrutiny. Have a look below and see if it’s right for your organisation. What are scrutiny zoom meetups? During the lockdown Dave Mckenna and Matt Clack have been running some scrutiny zoom meetups. These are a free, informal opportunity to network …
Here are the notes from scrutiny officers zoom meet-up on 10th June. We used an Open Space format and here are the top tips shared by participants from their various conversations. Thanks everyone! Virtual meetings appeared to be more interest in our virtual meeting than our normal meeting. Good opportunity to enhance knowledge of what …
The question and answer session, or Q&A, can be productive and helpful for ‘finding things out’ and for getting things ‘on the record’. However, if boards and committees want to move to the next level, then what’s needed is constructive conversations. The normal mode of engagement between independent (non-executive) members and the executive in the …
At this zoom meet up 30 participants worked on the question How can we best support public engagement in scrutiny at the time of Covid-19? using ‘appreciative interviews’. Thank you so much to everyone for their time and their contributions. We had had over 60 ideas and I’ve organised them into 9 answers in no particular …
We had 30 people attending this scrutiny zoom meet up (thanks everyone) and the main activity was a Users Experience Fishbowl looking at early experiences of virtual scrutiny meetings. In the fishbowl we had four officers and one councillor from West Sussex, Redbridge, Devon and Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole councils. The main learning points from …